Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1680/2026 of AJAY GHOSH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 18 September 2026
Court No.35. M/L.244. Rakib CRM (NDPS) 1680 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station case no. 964 of 2026 dated 04.06.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
18.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L.244. Rakib
CRM (NDPS) 1680 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station case no. 964 of 2026 dated 04.06.2026 under Sections 21(C)/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Ajay Ghosh
……Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, Ld. APP Mr. Amartya Ghosh Mr. Probal Das
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was produced before the learned Special Court after 36 hours. None of the orders of the learned Special Court reflects that the said issue was canvassed before the learned Special Court. Learned advocate appearing for the State has submitted a report wherein they claimed that after 23 hours the accused was produced before the Court but prior to the statutory mandate. If the petitioner has materials in his possession, petitioner will canvassed such issue before the learned jurisdictional Court/Special Court on the next date fixed. So far as the issue on merits is concerned, at this stage, this Court is not interfering on the same. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) 1680 of 2026 is disposed of.
2 Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)