Calcutta High Court

WP.ST/180/2026 of KAJAL CHOUBEY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 18 September 2026

Cites 2, Cited by 0

Item no. DL/1 Court No. 4 Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. W.P.S.T. 180 of 2026 In the matter of : SRI. KAJAL CHOUBEY …Petitioner VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. …Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr.

18.09.2026

Item no. DL/1

Court No. 4

Asraf, A.R.(Ct.)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Case No.

W.P.S.T. 180 of 2026

In the matter of :

SRI. KAJAL CHOUBEY

…Petitioner

VS.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

…Respondents

For the Petitioner :

Mr. M. N. Roy

Mr. G. Halder

…Advocates

For the Respondents/State :

Ms. Chandreyi Alam, AGP

Ms. Runu Mukherjee

…Advocates

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

2

Decisions referred to

In this index

2

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Without going into the issue pending before the Tribunal, we take note of the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the writ petitioner that he approached West Bengal Administrative Tribunal by way of original application bearing O. A. No.79 of 2026. The O.A. was filed at a time when the Tribunal was not functional for want of a Member.

2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that under such circumstances he is rendered remediless.

3. Under the circumstance, placing reliance on decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261 read with the later Judgement in the case of Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. reported in (2020) 6 SCC 1, he submits that he is entitled to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court for the relief for which he approached the Tribunal.

4. For enabling the petitioner to avail remedy before the learned Single Judge, we dispose of the Original Application bearing O.A. No. 79 of 2026.

5. We are disposing of the Original Application in the present proceeding, since it is submitted by the learned advocate for the writ petitioner that for want of a functional Tribunal, he is not even in a position to withdraw the pending Original Application for availing remedy before the learned Single Judge Bench.

6. O. A. No. 79 of 2026 accordingly stands disposed of.

7. The Writ Petition is also disposed of with liberty to avail remedy in accordance with law.

8. Copy of this order be communicated to the Registry of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal.

9. There will be no order as to costs.

10. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

( Madhuresh Prasad, J. )

( Partha Pratim Roy, J. )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead