Calcutta High Court

WPA/26235/2026 of PRANABESH PRADHAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

16 sdas WPA 26235 of 2026 Pranabesh Pradhan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. M. N. Roy Mr. G. Haldar ….. for the petitioner Ms. Soma Chakraborty Mr. Pronay Basak ….. for the State 1. Let affidavit- of -service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. The petitioner is

18.09.2026

sdas

WPA 26235 of 2026

Pranabesh Pradhan

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. M. N. Roy

Mr. G. Haldar

….. for the petitioner

Ms. Soma Chakraborty

Mr. Pronay Basak

….. for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved that persons in a separate cadre are getting promotional benefits and other consequential benefits thereof, while the petitioner in a separate cadre has not been granted such benefits.

3. The petitioner has himself opted to remain in this particular cadre, in spite of being given an opportunity to shift cadres. At this belated stage, the petitioner seeks parity with officers in a separate cadre.

4. However, since the petitioner has made a representation, which has been duly forwarded by the concerned authority to the respondent no. 2, I direct the respondent no. 2 to consider and dispose of such representation within a period of ten weeks from date upon giving a hearing to the petitioner with adequate prior notice.

5. Representation will be disposed of by passing a reasoned order which shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereafter.

6. I make it clear that consideration of this representation and the consequences thereof will not create any equity or right in favour of the petitioner which he did not otherwise have. The consideration will be strictly in line with his undertaking of April, 12, 2023 and the prevalent rules and regulations applicable to him.

7. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

8. There will be no order as to costs.

9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead