Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2864/2026 of RABIN DAS @ RABINDRA NATH DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 September 2026
Court No.35. M/L.212. Rakib (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 2864 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandipur Police Station case no. 362 of 2025 dated 20.09.2025 under Sections 80/85 of the Bharatiya
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
17.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L.212. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 2864 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandipur Police Station case no. 362 of 2025 dated 20.09.2025 under Sections 80/85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
And In the matter of : Rabin Das @ Rabindra Nath Das
……Petitioner. Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee Mr. Tirupati Mukherjee Ms. Smiti Sen
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharya Mr. Anirudha Sarkar
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the father-in-law and a senior citizen who has been foisted with the criminal case after the daughter-in-law committed suicide. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that there are substantial allegations so far as the inmates of the matrimonial home are concerned. It has also been submitted that the husband of the deceased has been arrested and is in custody and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Having considered the stage of the case and the post-mortem report do not reflect any physical injuries upon the deceased, I am of the opinion that custodial detention so far as the present petitioner is concerned, may not be warranted. As such, prayer for anticipatory
2 bail of the petitioner namely, Rabin Das @ Rabindra Nath Das is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court this order of anticipatory bail of the petitioner shall remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2864 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)