Calcutta High Court
WPA/24277/2026 of RITUPARNA DAS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 17 September 2026
16 sdas WPA 24277 of 2026 Rituparna Das Vs. Union of India & Ors. Ms. Meghla Das Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu ……. for the petitioner Ms. Sabita Roy ……. for the UOI Mr. Shiv Mangal Singh Mr. Aindrik Chatterjee ……. for the Indian Bank 1. Let affidavit- of
17.09.2026
16
sdas
WPA 24277 of 2026
Rituparna Das
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Ms. Meghla Das
Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu
……. for the petitioner
Ms. Sabita Roy
……. for the UOI
Mr. Shiv Mangal Singh
Mr. Aindrik Chatterjee
……. for the Indian Bank
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.
2. The writ petition, as filed, is premature as the candidature of the petitioner is still being considered, in view of the fact that the biometrics of the petitioner is not found to be an exact match.
3. The respondent Bank has taken steps to ascertain the genuinity of the left thumb impression of the petitioner, which has been placed on record.
4. Since the candidature of the petitioner has not been rejected and the respondent Bank has taken steps to ascertain the petitioner’s identity, Ms. Das, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
5. Such leave is granted.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)