Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2115/2026 of KABA SK @ KABATULLA SK @ KABATULLA @ KABA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 17 September 2026
411 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(M) 2115 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mothabari Police Station Case No. 270 of
17.09.2026
Sl. No. 411
Court No.35
Rohan
(Rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(M) 2115 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mothabari Police Station Case No. 270 of 2026 dated 07.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2026 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of: Kaba Sk @ Kabatulla Sk @ Kabatulla @ Kaba …Petitioner
Mr. Musarraf Alam Sk
Mr. Apan Saha
Mr. Sk. Sarfaraj Nawaj
Mr. T. Ahemed
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Pradeep Kumar ISngh
Mr. Ayan Mitra
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service submitted be kept with the record.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on April, 2026 and is in custody for about five months. Charge-sheet has not been submitted. There was a relationship, according to the learned advocate, which after turning sour, the present case has been registered.
3. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary and has drawn the attention of this Court to the statement of the victim as well as the medico-legal report.
2
4. On assessment of the same and the stage of the case, when the evidence of the victim is yet to be recorded, I am of the opinion that the petitioner cannot be released on bail at this stage.
5. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Kaba Sk @ Kabatulla Sk @ Kabatulla @ Kaba is rejected.
6. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2115 of 2026 is dismissed.
7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
8. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)