Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2890/2026 of ALALUDDIN MALLICK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 September 2026
Court No.35. M/L.216. Rakib (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 2890 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dhubulia Police Station case no. 88 of 2026 dated 02.03.2026 under Sections 80/85/103/316(2)/3(5) of the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
17.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L.216. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 2890 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dhubulia Police Station case no. 88 of 2026 dated 02.03.2026 under Sections 80/85/103/316(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Alaluddin Mallick
……Petitioner. Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder Ms. Saugata Chakraborty Ms. Anindita Kundu
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Ooiseeroop Sinha Ms. Nupur Chowdhury
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the father-in-law, the husband was arrested and was subsequently granted bail. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and the same is under Sections 85/80/108 of the BNS. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail as there are accusations. I have taken into account the post-mortem report and the statements of the witnesses. Having considered that charge-sheet has already been submitted, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioner, at this stage, is unwarranted. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Alaluddin Mallick is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such
2 terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court this order of anticipatory bail of the petitioner shall remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2890 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)