Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2902/2026 of PRASENJIT DAS @ PROSHON DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 September 2026
Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 2902 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station
17.09.2026
M/L - 219
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 2902 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1046
of 2025 dated 13.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Prasenjit Das @ Proshon Das …Petitioner
Mr. Amitabha Karmakar
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Brajesh Jha, Ld. APP
Ms. Mayukhi Mitra
Ms. Rima Banerjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that because of previous grudge, petitioner has been implicated in the instant case.
2. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary, referred to relevant injury report as well as the statement of the injured.
3. I have taken into account the opinion in respect of the injury by one Dr. Abhinandan Majumder, which reflects that the injury is simple.
2
4. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that although a case has been made out, complicity of the petitioner is there but custodial detention may not be required in the facts of the case.
5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Prasenjit Das @ Proshon Das is allowed.
6. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned Jurisdictional Court, this order of anticipatory bail would be valid for a period of six weeks.
8. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 2902 of 2026 is disposed of.
9. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
10. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)