Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2974/2026 of PRADIP KUMAR PASWAN @ PARDUN PASWAN @ PRADIP PASWAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 September 2026
17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 2974 of 2026 Pradip Kumar Paswan @ Pardun Paswan @ Pradip Paswan Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the
D/L 17
17.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 2974 of 2026
Pradip Kumar Paswan @ Pardun Paswan @ Pradip Paswan
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Liluah Police Station Case No.
of
dated
31.01.2026
under
Sections
126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/324(4)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
And
In the matter of :
Pradip Kumar Paswan @ Pardun Paswan @ Pradip Paswan
……Petitioner.
Mr. Mritunjoy Chatterjee
Mrs. Suchismita Chakraborty
Mr. Arka Roy
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal
Ms. Madhuri Simha
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produced the Case Diary.
3. I have taken into account the injury report and the statement of the injured.
4. Having considered the complicity and the nature of injury I am of the opinion that it is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Pradip Kumar Paswan @ Pardun Paswan @ Pradip Paswan in CRM (A) 2974 of 2026 is dismissed.
6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)