Calcutta High Court
CPAN/1217/2026 of PIYALI CHOWDHURY Vs KRISHNA GUPTA, THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER AND ANR on 17 September 2026
Ct. No.33 Sl. No.2 cm CPAN 1217 of 2026 With WPA 22568 of 2016 With WPA 23774 of 2016 Piyali Chowdhury Vs. Krishna Gupta, The State Election Commissioner & Anr. Mr. Abhimanyu Banerjee Mr. Abdul Nooman …. For the applicant/petitioner. 1. The learned advocate representing the
17.09.2026
Ct. No.33
Sl. No.2
cm
CPAN 1217 of 2026
With
WPA 22568 of 2016
With
WPA 23774 of 2016
Piyali Chowdhury
Vs.
Krishna Gupta, The State Election Commissioner & Anr.
Mr. Abhimanyu Banerjee
Mr. Abdul Nooman
…. For the applicant/petitioner.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate representing the applicant seeks leave to file a fresh affidavit and the same is allowed.
2. Let the instant contempt application be withdrawn without entertaining its merit with a liberty to file a fresh.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)