Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2093/2026 of MD AENYETULLAH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 September 2026
17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 Allowed IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2093 of 2026 Md. Aenyetullah Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of
D/L 393
17.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
Allowed
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 2093 of 2026
Md. Aenyetullah
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nabagram Police Station Case No. 27 of 2023 dated 01.02.2023 under Sections 326/307 of the IPC and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act
And
In the matter of : Md. Aenyetullah
……Petitioner.
Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv
Mr. Syed J. Abedin
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Kallol Mondal, P.P
Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupta
Mr. Sreyash Kumar Singh
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the case was registered in the year 2023. Petitioner has been arrested on or about 19th of May, 2026. It has been further contended that petitioner’s name was not appearing earlier in course of the investigation but has subsequently surfaced according to the prosecution.
2. Learned Advocate for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and produced the Case Diary.
3. I have taken into account the statements of one Ali Hossain and Ujjwal Sekh which was recorded on 04.02.2023. The said two persons again made statement on 09.04.2026. Having considered the same, I find variation in the statement. However, the same is subject to cross-examination at the time of trial.
4. Having taken into account the period of detention, charge-sheet having been submitted before the jurisdictional Court and the factum of materials appearing I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Md. Aenyetullah shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh.
6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned Trial Court.
7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 2093 of 2026 is allowed.
8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)