Calcutta High Court

WPA/24384/2026 of RABINDRA NATH KUNDU Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

17.09.2026 chanchal In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A 24384 of 2026 Rabindra Nath Kundu -versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Arindam Chakraborty Mr. Partha Sarathi Das Ms. Swarnali Ghosh … for the petitioner. Mr. S. N. Dutta

Sl. 12

17.09.2026

chanchal

In The High Court At Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

W.P.A 24384 of 2026

Rabindra Nath Kundu

-versus-

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Arindam Chakraborty

Mr. Partha Sarathi Das

Ms. Swarnali Ghosh

… for the petitioner.

Mr. S. N. Dutta

… for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioner submits that since the Appellate Tribunal has been constituted under Section 109 of CGST Act, and is functional from 2025-2026, the instant writ petition be transferred to the Appellate Tribunal, seeking inter alia, to prefer an appeal before the GSTAT Kolkata under Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017.

2. Such prayer is considered and allowed.

3. The petitioner shall prefer the appeal within a period of four weeks from date before the appellate tribunal. The period during which the writ petition has been pending be excluded for computing limitation.

4. However, it is made clear that if the appeal is not filed within specified period mentioned in this order the

2 Tribunal shall be at liberty not to entertain the hearing of the appeal on merits.

5. If the appeal is filed within time, the Tribunal is requested to complete the entire proceedings as expeditiously as possible peremptorily within a period of four months from the date of filing the appeal.

6. Till such decision is taken by the tribunal, the respondent authorities/WBGST are restrained from taking any coercive action in terms of the notice dated 26.08.2025 and 22.09.2025 against the petitioner.

7. With the above observations and directions the writ petition stands disposed.

8. Since affidavits have not been called for, the allegations made in the instant writ petition are deemed to have been denied and not admitted.

9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

( Smita Das De, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead