Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3204/2026 of ASIT MAZUMDER Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 September 2026
17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 3204 of 2026 Asit Mazumder Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/
D/L 245
17.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 3204 of 2026
Asit Mazumder
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Serampore Police Station Case No. 504 of 2026 dated 02.09.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/118(1)/118(2)/126(2)/127(2)/132/190/191(2)/191(3)
/221/324(4)/351(2)/351(3) of the BNS, 2023
And
In the matter of : Asit Mazumder
……Petitioner.
Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay
Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh
Mr. Md. Danish Farooqui
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Kallol Mondal, P.P, Sr. Adv
Mr. Sayak Chakraborty
Mr. Aditya Tiwari
Mr. Anamitra Banerjee
Mr. Pritam Roy
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner has preferred an application for anticipatory bail.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR nor the materials till date which has been collected do reveal any incriminating material for the petitioner to apprehend that he may be implicated in the present case.
3. In view of the State’s stand, I direct that if the Investigating Officer of the case warrants the custody of the petitioner at least seven days notice be provided to the petitioner for exhausting the remedies available under the law.
4. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 3204 of 2026 is disposed of.
5. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
6. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)