Calcutta High Court

CPAN/848/2026 of INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING AND RESEARCH AND ANR. Vs DR. MUKUL BHATTACHARJEE AND ORS. on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.04 Court No.11 Avijit Mitra CPAN 848 of 2026 International Institute of Nursing & Research, Kalyani & anr. -Versus- Professor Dr. Mukul Bhattacharjee & ors. in MAT 1026 of 2026 Mr. Pratik Dhar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Samir Halder, Mr. Snehal Sinha …… for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

17.09.2026 Item No.04 Court No.11 Avijit Mitra CPAN 848 of 2026

International Institute of Nursing & Research, Kalyani & anr. -Versus- Professor Dr. Mukul Bhattacharjee & ors. in MAT 1026 of 2026

Mr. Pratik Dhar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Samir Halder, Mr. Snehal Sinha …… for the petitioners/applicants Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee, Ms. Mary Datta, Mr. Rajdeep Mantha ….for the alleged contemnors Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee ….for the Indian Nursing Council

The present contempt application has been preferred by the International Institute of Nursing and Research, Kalyani and its functionary alleging violation of an order dated 25th June, 2026 passed in MAT 1026 of 2026. By the said order, this Court directed the respondents to grant provisional registration to the students/appellants in MAT 1026 of 2026 in the academic session 2025-2026 and to issue admit cards to enable them to participate in the B.Sc. Nursing first semester examination commencing on and from 30th June, 2026. Records further reveal that assailing the said order, the respondents therein preferred a Special Leave Petition which was dismissed upon contested hearing on 10th July, 2026. Mr. Dhar, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioners/applicants submits that the alleged contemnors have deliberately violated the directions contained in the order of this Court dated 25th June, 2026. Mr. Bhattacharyya, learned senior advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors submits that the order of this Court has already been complied with and for the unintentional delay which had occurred, he tenders unconditional apology on behalf of the alleged contemnors. Mr. Dhar submits that though examination has been held, the results have not yet been published. Responding to such submission, Mr. Bhattacharyya, submits, upon instruction, that the results pertaining to the concerned examination would be published, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three weeks from date. As our order has ultimately been complied with and as an unqualified apology has been tendered on behalf of the alleged contemnors, we are not inclined to proceed with the contempt application any further. The contempt application being CPAN 848 of 2026 is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.) 2

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead