Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/1899/2026 of SANJAY YADAV @ SANJOY YADAV Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026 Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483

D/L 13

16.09.2026

Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)

ct.no.35

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026

Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav

Vs

The State of West Bengal

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with S.C. Case No. 667 of 2025 arising out of Rahara Police Station Case No. 187 of 2025

dated05.07.2025

under

Sections

109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/3(5)/329(4)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023

and adding Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023

And

In the matter of : Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav

……Petitioner.

Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra

Mr. Koustav Bagchi

Mr. Priti Kar Bagchi

Mr. Debayan Ghosh

Ms. Madhurai Sinha

Mr. Bisal Roy

…for the Petitioner

Mr. Aditya Tiwari

Ms. Namrata Chatterjee

…for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for one year and two months. The genesis of the dispute arose out of a property/land dispute. Charges have already been framed.

2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits number of persons were injured. The offending weapon was recovered at the instance of the present petitioner and there is every possibility of the vulnerable witnesses being threatened.

3. I have considered the nature of the offence. The offence prima facie reflects dispute relating to land issues. The offending weapon was iron rod which was recovered at the instance of the petitioner. There are no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner.

4. Having considered the overall circumstances and the background of the purpose and dispute which escalated resulting in the offence being committed I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail on stringent conditions.

5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore.

6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, petitioner shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Rahara Police Station and shall inform the address where he would be residing to the learned ACJM, Barrackpore before his release. There would be a condition imposed by the learned ACJM, Barrackpore to the extent that the petitioner would meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned police station where he would be residing once in every ten days till the vulnerable witnesses are over. The concerned police station will once in a month send a report regarding the compliance of the conditions to the learned ACJM, Barrackpore/ Trial Court.

7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026 is allowed.

8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.

9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead