Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1759/2026 of PRASENJIT HAZRA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (NDPS) 1759 of 2026 Prasenjit Hazra Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out
D/L 271
16.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (NDPS) 1759 of 2026
Prasenjit Hazra
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Bowbazar Police Station Case No. 40 of 2024 dated 16.03.2024, under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (N.D.P.S.) Act, 1985
And
In the matter of : Prasenjit Biswas
……Petitioner.
Mr. Joy Chakrabarty
Mr. Kunal Ganguly
Mr. Subhodip Maity
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Somnath Adhikary
Ms. M. Sinha
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for two years and three months. There has been no recovery from the present petitioner, although the total quantum of recovery in the present case is 2160 bottles of cough syrup.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits petitioner was sub- tenant/lessee in respect of the property from where seizure has been effective.
3. There are communications/CDR available. Records reflects that out of 8 witnesses cited by the prosecution 5
witnesses have already been examined. P.W. 5 is in progress. Accordingly, a last chance is granted to the State to complete rest of the witnesses by 31st December, 2026.
4. At this stage prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after the aforesaid time period is over.
5. Accordingly, C.R.M (NDPS) 1759 of 2026 is dismissed.
6. Memo of evidence be kept with the record.
7. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)