Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1740/2026 of INDRAJIT MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (NDPS) 1740 of 2026 Indrajit Mandal Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in
D/L 264
16.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (NDPS) 1740 of 2026
Indrajit Mandal
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Special Case No.
100 of 2026 arising out of Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 30 of 2026 dated 06.01.2026, under Sections 21(c)/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (N.D.P.S.) Act, 1985
And
In the matter of : Indrajit Mandal
……Petitioner.
Mr. Sheelbhadra Sanyal
…for the Petitioner
Mrs. Rajashree V. Kumdulia
Mr. Haripada Nayak
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there has been total recovery of 111 bottles of eskuf cough syrup in the present case out of which from the petitioner 26 bottles of eskuf cough syrup was recovered from the present petitioner. Petitioner is in custody for 235 days. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and till date charges have not been framed.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that apart from recovery from the present petitioner there are atleast four NDPS cases against him.
3. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that the present case do not warrant the petitioner to be enlarged on bail. As such, prayer for bail of the present petitioner is rejected.
4. Accordingly, C.R.M (NDPS) 1740 of 2026 is dismissed.
5. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)