Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1956/2026 of REAJUL ISLAM @ RIPON SK @ REJAUL SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
- 43 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(NDPS) 1956 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Malda Police Station Case No. 785 of 2025
16.09.2026
Sl. No. - 43
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(NDPS) 1956 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Malda Police Station Case No. 785 of 2025 dated 09.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27(A)
of
the
Narcotic
Drugs
and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
-And-
In the matter of: Reajul Islam @ Ripon Sk. @ Rejaul Sk.
…Petitioner
Mr. Kazi M. Rahman
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharya
Mr. Anurag Roy
Mr. D. Chaudhuri
…for the Customs Authority
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the recovery in the present case is 26 bottles of Phensedyl. Similarly placed other accused persons have been granted bail.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to refute the issue regarding parity.
3. Having considered the same, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail on same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Rejaul Sk. @ Rejaul Sekh in CRM (NDPS) 289 of 2026.
4. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1956 of 2026 is disposed of.
2
5. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
6. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)