Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1936/2026 of ARUNAVA DHAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.23 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 1936 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Bizpur Police Station Case No. 38 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
16.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.23
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 1936 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Bizpur Police Station Case No. 38 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And
In Re : Arunava Dhar
... Petitioner.
Mr. Sourov Mondal, Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury
... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP, Mr. Rohan Bavishi
... For the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject-matter of the present case relates to alleged recovery of 30.650 kgs. of Ganja from the joint possession of the petitioner and another. So far as the weighment is concerned, there are issues regarding the same. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail. The records of the case reflect that rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are attracted. As such, at this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 1936 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed.
All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)