Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1966/2026 of FARIKUL SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
- 52 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(NDPS) 1966 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kulti Police Station Case No. 29 of 2025
16.09.2026
Sl. No. - 52
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(NDPS) 1966 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kulti Police Station Case No. 29 of 2025 dated 14.01.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 21(C)/25/29
of
the
Narcotic
Drugs
and
Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985.
-And-
In the matter of: Farikul Sk
…Petitioner
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Ms. Ankusha Ghosh
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Gurudas Mitra
Mr. Utsav Dutta
…for the Customs Authority
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly situated as the other accused person who has been granted bail in CRM (NDPS) 1629 of 2026.
2. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to refute the contention that the petitioner is not similarly situated as Harsh Kumar Burnwal, the other accused.
3. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Farikul Sk is allowed on same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Harsh Kumar Burnwal in CRM (NDPS) 1629 of 2026.
4. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1966 of 2026 is disposed of.
2
5. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
6. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)