Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1977/2026 of HABIBUR RAHAMAN @ HABU Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (NDPS) 1977 of 2026 Habibur Rahaman @ Habu Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
D/L 63
16.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (NDPS) 1977 of 2026
Habibur Rahaman @ Habu
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Gangarampur Police Station Case No. 615 of 2024 dated 19.11.2024, under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28/29
of
the
Narcotic
Drugs
and
Psychotropic Substances (N.D.P.S.) Act, 1985
And
In the matter of : Habibur Rahaman @ Habu
……Petitioner.
Mr. K. Choudhury
Mr. Dwaipayan Panda
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharyya
Ms. Tanusree Kar
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the case relate to alleged recovery of 1200 bottles of phensedyl from a garden/bush and the petitioner was subsequently shown arrested in connection with this case.
2. It has been claimed that another accused person namely Saddam Hossain has been granted bail in CRM (NDPS) 351 of 2026.
3. State has produced memo of evidence which reflects that there are 6 criminal cases pending against the present petitioner. All the cases are under NDPS Act.
4. Having considered the checkered history of the present petitioner I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting bail as the second limb of the twin conditions in Section 37 is not satisfied.
5. Accordingly, C.R.M (NDPS) 1977 of 2026 is dismissed.
6. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
7. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)