Calcutta High Court

CRM (NDPS)/1958/2026 of SANIUL SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

- 45 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(NDPS) 1958 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 704 of

16.09.2026

Sl. No. - 45

Court No.35

Rohan

(Rejected)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

C.R.M.(NDPS) 1958 of 2026

In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 704 of 2019 dated 31.10.2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

-And-

In the matter of: Saniul Sk

…Petitioner

Mr. Manjeet Saha

… for the Petitioner

Mr. Amitave Karmakar

Ms. Jayashree Patra

…for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrested on 14th January, 2026 and he has been earlier arrested and was granted bail in another case Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 58 of 2026. So far as the present case is concerned, another accused, being his brother, has already been granted bail.

2. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has been evading the process of law for more than six and a half years. He was arrested in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 58 of 2026, thereafter, shown arrested in the present case.

2

3. Having considered the period for which the petitioner was evading the process of law, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

4. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

5. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1958 of 2026 is dismissed.

6. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.

7. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead