Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1973/2026 of SANJAY HALDER @ BISPAI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (NDPS) 1973 of 2026 Sanjay Halder @ Bispai Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in
D/L 59
16.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (NDPS) 1973 of 2026
Sanjay Halder @ Bispai
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chinsurah Police Station Case No. 276 of 2025 dated 20.07.2025, under Sections 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (N.D.P.S.)
Act, 1985
And
In the matter of : Sanjay Halder @ Bispai
……Petitioner.
Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee
Mr. Arkaprabho Roy
…for the Petitioner
Mr. L. Vishal Kumar
Mr. Sanjib Das
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and an alleged recovery of 5.5 litres of codeine mixture has been shown by the prosecution. It has also been contended that charge-sheet have been submitted and petitioner is in custody for more than 13 months.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
3. There are five criminal antecedents of the present petitioner.
4. Having considered the quantum of recovery and the antecedents I am of the opinion that rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is attracted.
5. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
6. Accordingly, C.R.M (NDPS) 1973 of 2026 is dismissed.
7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)