Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1965/2026 of SAMAD HOSSAIN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
- 51 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(NDPS) 1965 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 723 of
16.09.2026
Sl. No. - 51
Court No.35
Rohan
(Rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(NDPS) 1965 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 723 of 2024 dated 23.05.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 21(C)/25/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
-And-
In the matter of: Samad Hossain
…Petitioner
Mr. Sagar Saha
Mr. Manjeet Saha
… for the Petitioner
Mr. Amarta Ghosh
Ms. Nupur Chaudhuri
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been detained unnecessarily for more than two years three months.
2. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there has been recovery of 2 kg 6 gm of brown sugar from the present petitioner.
3. Be that as it may, the period undergone do call for interference of this Court.
4. State is directed to take steps so that at least the seizure list witnesses are examined within a reasonable period of time preferably within a period of four months from the next date fixed.
2
5. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at this stage.
6. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1965 of 2026 is dismissed.
7. Learned advocate for the State would communicate this order to the learned Trial Court immediately for taking appropriate action.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)