Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/1941/2026 of ABDUR RAHAMAN AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 16 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.28 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 1941 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 206 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
16.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.28
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 1941 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 206 of 2025 dated 12.02.2025 under Sections 21(c)/25/27A/29/30 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And
In Re : Abdur Rahaman and another ... Petitioners.
Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Mrs. Suchismita Chakraborty, Mr. Debarnab Adhikary
... For the Petitioners.
Mr. Ayan Basu, Mr. Gautam Banerjee
... For the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in custody for 1 year 7 months; charge-sheet has already been submitted and two of the accused persons have been granted bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that two accused persons who have been granted bail in CRM(NDPS) 1116 of 2025 and CRM(NDPS) 863 of 2025 from them, there has been no recovery made and they were arrested on the basis of statement of co-accused. So far as the present petitioners are concerned, there has been recovery from both the petitioners. Having considered the quantum of recovery in the present case, which is of 2.915 kgs. of Brown sugar, 5.946
kgs. of Sodium Carbonate and Acetyl Chloride, I am not inclined to release the petitioners on bail as rigours of Section 37 of the NDS act are attracted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 1941 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)