Calcutta High Court
WPA/6961/2026 of NIRMAL NASKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 16 September 2026
2026 Item no.D/L 06 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 6961 of 2026 In the matter of : Nirmal Naskar …. Petitioner VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner:
16th Sept., 2026
Item no.D/L 06
Court No. 24
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 6961 of 2026
In the matter of:
Nirmal Naskar
…. Petitioner
VS.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Mahammad Mahmud
Mr. Chottu Naskar
….Advocates
For the State:
Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey
Mr. Partho Sarathi Biswas
….Advocates
For the NMC:
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy
….Advocate
For the WBMCC:
Mr. Srijib Chakraborty
Mr. Aditya Mondal
….Advocates
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Perused the instruction forwarded by the Director of Medical Education and the Chairman of WBMCC as well as the instruction forwarded by the Secretary, National Medical Commission dated 1st April, 2026 wherefrom it appears that the last date of admission in NEET-PG-25 was 28th February, 2026.
2. Even though the petitioner reported for admission to the college on 17th February, 2026 and paid the admissions fees on 19th February, 2026 but as he was unable to produce all the relevant documents required for admission in the course, he could not take admission within the stipulated time period.
Page 2
3. In the absence of all the relevant documents, it was not possible for the authority to admit the petitioner. It was the duty of the petitioner to produce all the necessary documents before the authority for taking admission.
4. Today, at such delayed point of time, there is hardly any scope for permitting the petitioner to take admission in the subject course.
5. It will be open for the petitioner to apply for taking refund of the admission fee which he deposited for taking admission.
6. No further relief can be granted to the petitioner in the instant writ petition. The writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
7. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
8. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)