Calcutta High Court
MAT/1517/2026 of ALL BENGAL URABAN PROVERTY ALLEVIATION AND LIVELIHOOD MISSION STAFF ASSOCIATION AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 16 September 2026
Court. No. 12 GB MAT 1517 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 All Bengal Urban Poverty Alleviation & Livelihood Mission Staff Association & Ors. VS State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subrata Mukhapadhyay, Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh, Mrs. Basabi Roy Chowdhury, Ms. Riddhi Ghosh … for the
Item No.10
16.09.2026
Court. No. 12
GB
MAT 1517 of 2026
With
CAN 1 of 2026
All Bengal Urban Poverty Alleviation & Livelihood Mission Staff Association & Ors.
VS
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Subrata Mukhapadhyay,
Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh,
Mrs. Basabi Roy Chowdhury,
Ms. Riddhi Ghosh
… for the Appellants.
Mr. Tirtha Pati Acharyya
… for the UOI.
Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra,
Mr. Madhu Jana,
Mr. A. Mishra
… for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the order impugned dated August 1, 2026, the learned Single Judge directed the matter to go out of list upon, inter alia, holding that the appellants were not interested to move the matter before His Lordship.
2. We are told that the matter was listed on a Saturday and the learned advocate who appeared for the appellants could not produce the affidavit of service.
3. We are of the view that, on account of inability of the learned advocate to produce the affidavit-of-service, the appellants should not suffer. Accordingly, we set aside the order with a request to the learned Single Judge to hear out the writ petition within a period of one month from the date of communication of this
2 order, upon the same being listed before His Lordship. Liberty to mention.
4. Learned advocates who appear in the appeal have informed us that they are not engaged in the writ petition. Under such circumstances, fresh service be effected upon all the respondents, including the learned Government Pleader within a week.
5. The affidavit-of-service indicating service upon the respondents including the State respondent will be filed before His Lordship.
6. Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of.
7. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
(Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.)