Calcutta High Court

WPA/23788/2026 of SYED MAJIBUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 16 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

AD/33/18 266312 NANDY (DISPOSED OF ) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/23788/2026 SYED MAJIBUR RAHMAN VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Ms. Susmita Dey Basu, Advocate Mr. Kaustav Ghosh, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. N.C.

AD/33/18

266312

NANDY

(DISPOSED OF)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/23788/2026

SYED MAJIBUR RAHMAN

VS

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Ms. Susmita Dey Basu, Advocate

Mr. Kaustav Ghosh, Advocate

……for the Petitioner

Mr. N.C. Bihani, Sr. Advocate

Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, Advocate

……for the CSTC

Mr. Atanu Basu, Advocate

……for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner is aggrieved that a sum of Rs.1,61,186/- has been recovered from his terminal benefits on the ground of overdrawal.

2. The petitioner worked as a Junior Traffic Supervisor attached to the Taratala Depot of respondent no. 3. The petitioner retired on November 30, 2025. It was only thereafter that the amounts have been deducted from his terminal benefits.

3. The issue has been settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in State of Punjab vs. Rafiq Masih reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334.

4. Such deduction cannot be made from the terminal benefits of the petitioner, as the amounts have been paid not due to any default, misrepresentation, or any act of commission or omission of the petitioner.

5. The respondent authorities are directed to refund the sum of Rs.1,61,186/- by November 30, 2026.

6. Since the terminal benefits are right of the petitioner, he will be entitled to interest at the rate P a g e | 2

of 6% per annum from the date the amounts became due till the actual payment thereof.

7. With the afore-stated direction, the petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

(REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead