Calcutta High Court
WPA/23083/2026 of SUBHADIP BATABYAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 16 September 2026
AD/27/18 266312 NANDY (OP) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/23083/2026 SUBHADIP BATABYAL VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Bikram Banerjee, Advocate (online) Mr. Saikat Sutradhar, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Ms. Piyali
AD/27/18
266312
NANDY
(OP)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA/23083/2026
SUBHADIP BATABYAL
VS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Mr. Bikram Banerjee, Advocate (online)
Mr. Saikat Sutradhar, Advocate
……for the Petitioner
Ms. Piyali Sengupta, Advocate
Mr. Victor Chatterjee, Advocate
……for the PSC
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record.
2. Mr. Banerjee, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that an application is pending before the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal being OA/236/2025. Since the tribunal is not in session for over a year now, he has preferred the instant writ petition.
3. However, the instant writ petition on the selfsame cause of action cannot be entertained at this stage as held by a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in WPST/209/2025 and WPST/210/ 2025 (Aninda Sundar Das Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.).
4. In view thereof, the instant writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
5. The petitioner will be at liberty to take steps as may be advised.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)
P a g e | 2