Calcutta High Court
WPA(P)/355/2026 of ABU JAFAR HALDER Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 16 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA D/L.18 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION Saikat APPELLATE SIDE Mukherjee WPA(P)/355/2026 ABU JAFAR HALDER VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Appearance: Mr. Bapin Baidya, Mr. Soumen Gayen, Mr. Sandipan Maitra, ...Advocates For Petitioner Mr. D.N. Ray, G.P. Mr. Lokenath
Ct. No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
D/L.18 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
Saikat APPELLATE SIDE
Mukherjee
WPA(P)/355/2026
ABU JAFAR HALDER
VS.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Appearance:
Mr. Bapin Baidya,
Mr. Soumen Gayen,
Mr. Sandipan Maitra,
...Advocates For Petitioner
Mr. D.N. Ray, G.P.
Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee,
Mr. Guddu Singh,
...Advocates For State
Mr. Lakshinath Bhattacharya,
...Advocate For Respondent Nos.5, 6 & 7
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, CJ.
&
ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.
DATE: 16th September, 2026.
ORDER (Per Court)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard the learned advocate for the Petitioner, who claims to be a social worker residing more than 30 kilometres away from the locality/colony where a short iron pillar is installed in the road to restrain heavy and large vehicles from entering the small by-lane in the colony.
2. The Learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.7 has submitted a report in the form of an affidavit (six pages). The same is marked as X-1, for identification.
3. We expressed our disinclination.
4. The Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.
5. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn on instructions.
6. We deem it appropriate to record that if the present Petitioner initiates any proceedings in the same cause or connected thereto, before any other authority or Court or body, the issue of the locus of the Petitioner shall be first tested. (Arijit Banerjee, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge) Chief Justice