Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1817/2026 of MD NUR NOBI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 15 September 2026
no. 14 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1817 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Shasan PS Case No. 210 of 2024 dated 15.09.2024 u/s 65(2) of the BNS read with section
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
15.09.2026 Serial no. 14 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1817 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Shasan PS Case No. 210 of 2024 dated 15.09.2024 u/s 65(2) of the BNS read with section 6 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Md. Nur Nobi
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Fazlur Rahman Mr. R. Rahman Ms. Dona Sanyal
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ajay Ray Mr. Supreem Naskar
… for the State-respondent(s) Ms. R. V. Kundalia
… defacto-complainant
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for two years and six months and till date out of the 21 witnesses, only five witnesses have been examined in the last few months. The records of the case and the medico-legal examination report depict that there were injuries sustained at the private parts of the victim who at the relevant point of time was about eight-year-old. Having regard to the evidence which has already surfaced; the gravity of the offence and the consequences of the severity of the punishment in case of conviction, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present petitioner.
2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1817 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)