Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2823/2026 of ANAYATULLA SHAIKH @ ENAYETULLAH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 15 September 2026
Court No.35. M/L.200. Rakib (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 2823 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Malda Cyber Crime Police Station case no. 05 of 2026 dated 13.07.2026 under Sections 351(2)/356/79 of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
15.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L.200. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 2823 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Malda Cyber Crime Police Station case no. 05 of 2026 dated 13.07.2026 under Sections 351(2)/356/79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Anayatulla Shaikh @ Enayetullah
……Petitioner. Mr. Biswajit Tiwari Mr. Md. Sontu Mia Ms. Alisha Parvin Ms. Masuma Khatun Mr. Md. Aziz Ali Aman
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the case has been registered for threatening the informant. There was an earlier case pursuant to the same the present case has been initiated to harass the petitioner. So far as the State is concerned, State has produced the Case Diary opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that by way of Whatsapp and other social networking platforms victim has been threatened. Having regard to the materials available in the Case Diary, I am of the opinion that although case has been made out but custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Anayatulla Shaikh @ Enayetullah is allowed.
2 Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days. In case, the petitioner do not report to the investigating officer within a period of ten days, this order of anticipatory bail will be deemed to be cancelled. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2823 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)