Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2679/2026 of JISHNU DAS @ BISHNU DAS AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 15 September 2026
Court No.35 Rohan (Partly Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 2679 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mothabari Police Station
15.09.2026
M/L - 179
Court No.35
Rohan
(Partly
Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 2679 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mothabari Police Station Case No. 267 of 2024 dated 17.05.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 341/325/326/307/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
-And-
In the matter of: Jishnu Das @ Bishnu Das & Ors.
…Petitioners
Mr. Kazi M. Rahman
…for the Petitioners
Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee
Mr. Chandra Gupta Konar
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in connection with the present case.
2. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary.
3. I have taken into account the injury report as well as the statement of the injured.
4. Having considered the nature of injury and the complicity of each of the petitioners, I am of the opinion that there are overt act of the petitioner No. 1, Jishnu Das @ Bishnu Das and petitioner No. 3, Sudhir Das. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
2
5. So far as petitioner No. 2, Nilima Mandal Das @ Nilima Das is concerned, her prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.
6. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner No. 2, namely, Nilima Mandal Das @ Nilima Das, be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned Jurisdictional Court, this order of anticipatory bail would be valid for a period of six weeks.
8. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 2679 of 2026 is disposed of.
9. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
10. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)