Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2078/2026 of HUMAYUN MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 15 September 2026
15.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2078 of 2026 Humayun Mondal Vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483
D/L 40
15.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 2078 of 2026
Humayun Mondal
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Berhampore Police Station Case No. 2206 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025 under Sections 143(4)/144(1)/61(2)/64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3/4/5/6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention), Act, 1956 and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual offences Act, (Amended) 2012,
2019.
And
In the matter of : Humayun Mondal
……Petitioner.
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Mr. Anisur Rahaman
…for the Petitioner
Ms. Rajashree Venket Kundalia
Mr. Sunil Gupta
…for the State
Ms. Sarmistha Basak
…for the De-facto Complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s bail was lastly rejected in CRM (M) 592 of 2026.
2. There has been no change of circumstances.
3. Learned Advocate for the State has produced the Case Diary.
4. I have taken into account the materials appearing against the present petitioner.
5. Having considered the same I am of the view that this is not a fit case to release the petitioner on bail at this stage.
6. Learned Trial Court is directed to speed up the trial by exhausting the process of law and proceed with the stage of consideration of charges.
7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 2078 of 2026 is dismissed.
8. Memo of evidence be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)