Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/963/2026 of DEBASISH SARKAR @ DEBASHIS SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 15 September 2026
Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 963 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Basirhat Police Station Case No.
15.09.2026
M/L - 112
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 963 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Basirhat Police Station Case No. 510 of 2024
dated 19.07.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2)/318(4)/336(2)/338/336(3)/340(1)(2)/61(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Debasish Sarkar @ Debashis Sarkar …Petitioner
Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu
Mr. Md. Jannat ul Firdouz
Mr. Rajsekhar Hota
Ms. Pramita Banerjee
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Pritam Roy
Ms. Triparna Roy
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case.
2. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the present petitioner has been identifier in two of the gift deeds. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. Genesis of the case relates to property dispute.
3. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
2
4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Debasish Sarkar @ Debashis Sarkar is allowed.
5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned Jurisdictional Court, this order of anticipatory bail would be valid for a period of six weeks.
7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 963 of 2026 is disposed of.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)