Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2851/2026 of PRADEEP KUMAR @ PRADIP @ BUNTY MAHATO Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 15 September 2026
Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 2851 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Asansol South Police Station
15.09.2026
M/L - 209
Court No.35
Rohan
(Rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 2851 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Asansol South Police Station Case No. 202 of 2026 dated 29.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/118(1)/109(1)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Pradeep Kumar @ Pradip @ Bunty Mahato …Petitioner
Mr. Amajit De
…for the Petitioner
Ms. Soma Mishra Chatterjee
Mr. Narayan Debnath
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner himself sustained injury.
2. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary.
3. I have taken into account the statement of the injured as well as the injury report.
4. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the present petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
2
6. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 2851 of 2026 is dismissed.
7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
8. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)