Calcutta High Court
WPA/3665/2020 of NURUL ISLAM @NURUL ISLAM KHAN Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS on 15 September 2026
2026 Item no.D/L 01 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 3665 of 2020 (CAN 1 of 2022) (CAN 2 of 2024) In the matter of : Nurul Islam alias Nurul Islam Khan …. Petitioner VS. Union of India & Ors.
15th Sept., 2026
Item no.D/L 01
Court No. 24
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 3665 of 2020
(CAN 1 of 2022)
(CAN 2 of 2024)
In the matter of:
Nurul Islam alias Nurul Islam Khan
…. Petitioner
VS.
Union of India & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Jatindra Barik
….Advocate
For the Respondent nos. 2 & 4:
Ms. Deblina Banerjee
….Advocate
In Re:- CAN 2 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. An application for recalling the order dated 24th April, 2024 has been filed by the petitioner.
3. I have perused the application for restoration and being satisfied with the ground mentioned in the application, recall the order dated 24th April, 2024. Let the writ petition be restored to its original file and number.
4. The application being CAN 2 of 2024 stand disposed of. In Re: WPA 3665 of 2020
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not inclined to proceed with the writ petition any further.
2. In view of such submission, the writ petition and the connected application being CAN 1 of 2022 stand dismissed as ‘not pressed’.
3. Written instruction from the petitioner produced in Court today be retained with the records.
Page 2
4. Dismissal of the writ petition will not stand in the way of the petitioner to approach the University for redressal of his grievances in accordance with law.
5. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
6. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)