Calcutta High Court
MAT/519/2024 of ROSEDALE GARDEN APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION Vs THE NEW TOWN KOLKATA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS on 14 September 2026
Item No.6 ap MAT 519 of 2024 With I.A. No. CAN 4 of 2026 Rosedale Garden Apartment Owners Association Vs. The New Town Kolkata Development Authority and Ors. Mr. Srijib Chakraborty, Mr. Aditya Mondal, Ms. Shomrita Das, Mr. Shomrik Das. … For the Appellant. Mr. Anirban Ray, ld. Senior
25.09.2026
Court No.13
Item No.6
ap
MAT 519 of 2024
With
I.A. No. CAN 4 of 2026
Rosedale Garden Apartment Owners Association
Vs.
The New Town Kolkata Development Authority and Ors.
Mr. Srijib Chakraborty,
Mr. Aditya Mondal,
Ms. Shomrita Das,
Mr. Shomrik Das.
… For the Appellant.
Mr. Anirban Ray, ld. Senior Advocate
Ms. Munmun Ganguly,
Mr. Sayan Ganguly.
… For the NKDA.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Banerjee, ld. Senior Advocate Mr. Debabrata Banerjee, Mr. Samir Kr. Chakraborty.
… For the Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Mr. Soumya Majumder, ld. Senior Advocate, Mr. Aritra Basu, Ms. Madhusmita Senapati, Ms. Swastika Roy.
… For the Respondent No.6.
Mr. Jayanta Kumar Mitra, ld. Senior Advocate, Mr. Rohit Das, Mr. Indradip Das, Ms. Kishwar Rahman, Ms. Anugraha Sundas.
… For the Respondent Nos.7 to 9.
Re: CAN 4 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CAN 4 of 2026 is an application praying for expunging certain passages in paragraphs 32, 48, 87, 88 and 94 of the judgment of this Court dated 14th September, 2026.
2. Mr. Jayanta Kumar Mitra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicant has submitted that this Court has wrongly recorded certain concessions stated to
2 have been made by him in course of hearing of M.A.T. 519 of 2024.
3. Mr. Srijib Chakraborty, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, who are respondents in the application, has opposed the submissions of Mr. Mitra and submits that his clients intend to use an affidavit-in- opposition to the said CAN 4 of 2026.
4. Let such affidavit be filed by October 1, 2026. Reply, if any, thereto be filed one week thereafter.
5. List the matter before this Court on 12th October, 2026 under the same heading.
6. The question of maintainability of the application as raised by Mr. Srijib Chakraborty is kept open for being decided after receiving affidavits.
7. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
(Anuj Singh, J.)