Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/1063/2026 of ZUBBER ALAM @ JUBER ALAM AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 September 2026
Court No.35. M/L. 121. Kausik (Rejected) CRM ( A ) 1063 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Islampur Police Station Case No. 466/2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
14.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 121. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (A) 1063 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Islampur Police Station Case No. 466/2020 dated 10.06.2020 under sections 448/324/325/307/354/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And In the matter of : Zubber Alam @ Juber Alam & Ors.
……Petitioners.
Mr. Sourav Mondal
Mr. Nazar Chowdhury
Ms. Priyanka Saha
Mr. Rony Mondal
Ms. Farheen Rais
……for the Petitioners.
Mr. Amal Kumar Datta
Mr. Rishav Kumar Thakur
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been foisted in a criminal case over issues relating to property.
State has submitted the case diary. Attention of the Court has been drawn to the injury report and statement of the injured.
2
I find one of the injured had to be administered 6 stitches. All the accused persons have been uniformly named herein in the statement of the injured.
Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
As such prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners namely, Zubber Alam @ Juber Alam, Ali Hussain, Md. Hafijul Rahaman, Hamidul @ Hamid in CRM (A) 1063 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)