Calcutta High Court

WP.ST/7/2023 of JIBAN DUTTA AND ORS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026 (D/L No.4) Ct. No.4 (SKB) W.P.S.T. 7 of 2023 (Assigned) With CAN 1 of 2023 Jiban Dutta and others Versus The State of West Bengal and others Mr. Anindya Lahiri, Sr. Adv., Mr. Subit Mondal, Mr. Samrat Dey Paul … for the petitioners. 1. Heard the learned senior advocate for the

14th September, 2026

(D/L No.4)

Ct. No.4

(SKB)

W.P.S.T. 7 of 2023

(Assigned)

With

CAN 1 of 2023

Jiban Dutta and others

Versus

The State of West Bengal and others

Mr. Anindya Lahiri, Sr. Adv.,

Mr. Subit Mondal,

Mr. Samrat Dey Paul

… for the petitioners.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard the learned senior advocate for the petitioners. None appears for the State.

2. The learned senior advocate appearing for the writ petitioners submits that the matter has been pending before the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal (in short ‘Tribunal’) since long. The Tribunal is, however, non-functional.

3. Under the circumstance, the learned senior advocate for the writ petitioners submits that since no order of the Tribunal is assailed in the present proceeding, he does not wish to proceed with the present writ petition.

4. He submits that due to non-availability of functional Tribunal; and since no issues have been issued by the Tribunal till date, he will withdraw the application pending before the Tribunal and avail remedy before the learned

2 Single Bench having determination in respect of service matters, within which the present writ petition falls.

5. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy in accordance with law. The petitioners before availing remedy before the learned Single Bench would have to give an undertaking regarding withdrawal of the Original Application bearing O.A. No.470 of 2019 pending before the Tribunal.

6. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

7. Accordingly, the application being CAN 1 of 2023 is also disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)

(Partha Pratim Roy, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead