Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1883/2026 of SUKURU DAS @ CHINGRI @ SUKURU Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 14 September 2026
no. 17 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1883 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Bally PS Case No. 28 of 2025 dated 23.02.2025 u/s 62(2)/351(3) Of the BNS read with
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
14.09.2026 Serial no. 17 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1883 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Bally PS Case No. 28 of 2025 dated 23.02.2025 u/s 62(2)/351(3) Of the BNS read with section 6 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Sukuru Das @ Chingri @ Sukuru
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Suman De Mr. Abhinaba Mukherjee
… for the Petitioner(s)
Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 23.02.2025 and since then he is in custody. Learned advocate also submits that out of the 18 witnesses cited in the charge-sheet, only one witness has been examined till date, as such, there is no possibility of the trial being concluded very soon. Learned advocate prays that the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary. I have taken into account the statement of the victim as well as the medico-legal examination report. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting bail to the present petitioner.
2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1883 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)