Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1904/2026 of ARIJIT ROY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 14 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 20. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1904 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Jangipara Police Station Case No. 141 of 2026 dated 17.04.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
14.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 20. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (M) 1904 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Jangipara Police Station Case No. 141 of 2026 dated 17.04.2026 under Sections 64(2)(m)/76/351(3) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
And In the matter of : Arijit Roy
……Petitioner.
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty
Mr. Santanu Maji
Mr. Subhayu Das
Ms. Debrani Mondal
….for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Sr. Govt. Adv.
Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2026 and although charge sheet has been submitted but witness action has not commenced.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail, draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS.
Having considered the statement of the victim, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
2
Petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the vulnerable witnesses being the victim along with the witnesses referred as ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘D’ are over.
With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1904 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)