Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1867/2026 of CHAMPA BEGUM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 September 2026
no. 11 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1867 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Barasat PS Case No. 476 of 2024 dated 13.08.2024 u/s 96/143/98/99/61(2) of the BNS,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
14.09.2026 Serial no. 11 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1867 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Barasat PS Case No. 476 of 2024 dated 13.08.2024 u/s 96/143/98/99/61(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with sections 3/4/5/6/7/9 of the Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act 1956 and 4/6/17 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Champa Begum
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Ayan Mitra
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kallol Mondal Mr. Sreyash Kumar Singh
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent who was arrested on 13.08.2024 and since then he is in custody. Learned advocate also submits that there is no complicity of the present petitioner and the petitioner has been unnecessarily languishing in jail State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the court to the statement of different witnesses. Primarily, it reflects from the records that the petitioner was arrested at the spot and there were minor girls who were recovered and in their statement under section 183 of the BNSS, they have stated the purpose for which they were present over there. The records also reflect that presently the cross- examination of the P.W.1 is in progress and last of the order-sheets which has been enclosed reflects that time was sought for on behalf of the present petitioner for cross- examination. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that none of the accused persons in this case have been granted bail which is admitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner. Having regard to the stage of the case and the complicity of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present petitioner at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1867 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)