Calcutta High Court
CRA (DB)/297/2026 of IBADULLA TARAFDAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 September 2026
Sl. No. 1 Court No.11 s.biswas CRA(DB) 297 of 2026 with CRAN 1 of 2026 In re: An application under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C., corresponding to Section 415(2) of the BNSS. Ibadulla Tarafdar Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Shashanka Shekar Saha ... for the appellant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
September 14, 2026 Sl. No. 1 Court No.11 s.biswas
CRA(DB) 297 of 2026 with CRAN 1 of 2026
In re: An application under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C., corresponding to Section 415(2) of the BNSS.
Ibadulla Tarafdar Vs. The State of West Bengal
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Shashanka Shekar Saha ... for the appellant Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, APP Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi ... for the State
By reason of a typographical error in the cause title of the order dated 3rd September, 2026, the name of Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharyya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who appeared on behalf of the State, was not incorporated. Office is directed to effect necessary correction. By an earlier order dated 3rd September, 2026, the department was asked to file a report. Pursuant to such direction, a report has been filed wherein it has inter alia been stated that the case record has already been received back from the Hon’ble High Court and it is lying with the learned Trial Court. Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing for the appellant apprises this Court that the certified copy of the
2 judgment impugned has already been obtained. Let the same, as placed, be kept on record. In re: CRAN 1 of 2026 Upon hearing the learned advocate appearing for the respective parties and considering the averments made in the application for condonation of delay, we are satisfied with the explanation given towards the delay in preferring the appeal. Accordingly, such delay is condoned and the application being CRAN 1 of 2026 is disposed of. In re: CRA(DB) 297 of 2026 The appeal is admitted. Call for the records. Issue usual notices. Realization of fine, if any, be stayed. Paper books be prepared within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of the Trial Court Records. Liberty is granted to the appellant to apply for bail upon notice to the State, through the learned Public Prosecutor, High Court at Calcutta. All parties would act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Rishad Medora, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)