Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/956/2026 of BIPLAB MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 September 2026
Court No.35. M/L. 109. Kausik (Rejected) CRM ( A ) 956 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bamongola Police Station Case No. 10 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
14.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 109. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (A) 956 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bamongola Police Station Case No. 10 of 2026 dated 28.01.2026 under Section 21(C)/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Biplab Mondal
……Petitioner.
Mr. Kalidas Saha
Ms. Khushi Mollick
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP
Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case on the basis of statement of co-accused.
Learned advocate for the State submits that there are Call Detail Records associated with one of the accused namely, Mijanur Sarkar and the motorcycle which has been intercepted in the present case belongs to the present petitioner namely, Biplab Mondal.
2 Considering the two issues involved and the recovery of 310 Gms. of Brown Sugar in the present case, I am of the opinion, this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Biplab Mondal in CRM (A) 956 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)