Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1916/2026 of SUBHANKAR MAHANTI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 24. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1916 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Dakshineswar Police Station Case No. 130 of 2024 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
14.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 24. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (M) 1916 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Dakshineswar Police Station Case No. 130 of 2024 dated 31.08.2024 under Section 126(2), 127(2), 143, 144, 95, 96, 61(2), 64, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and under Section 4, 17 of POCSO Act and Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of ITP Act, 1956.
And In the matter of : Subhankar Mahanti
……Petitioner.
Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Satabdi Das
Mr. Rahul Deb Goenka
….for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Ld. APP
Mr. Somnath Adhikary
….for the State.
Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected. Petitioner was directed to renew the prayer for bail after the evidence of the victim girl was over.
State has pointed as also the order sheets reflects that there are two victim girls. Still the evidence has not been completed, the two victim girl’s cross examination is pending.
2
Having considered that there are no change of circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is dismissed.
Accordingly, CRM (M) 1916 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)