Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2565/2026 of BABLU DHARA AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.M/L.146 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. ( A ) 2565 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Uluberia Police Station Case

11.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.M/L.146

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

Ct.No.35

dc.

Allowed

C.R.M. (A) 2565 of 2026

In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Uluberia Police Station Case No. 385 of 2026

dated 15.06.2026 under Sections 420/406/384/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (G.R. Case No. 1801/2026).

And

In Re :

Bablu Dhara and another

... Petitioners.

Mr. Kunal Ganguly,

Mr. Subhodip Maity

... For the Petitioners.

Ms. Sreshtha Ghosh,

Ms. Sanjana Jha

... For the State.

Learned

advocate

appearing

for

the

petitioners

submits that petitioners have been foisted in connection with the instant case pursuant to change in administration.

Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

I find from the information which was furnished to the police authorities that the accusations relate back to the year 2020-2021. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that although a case for investigation may have been made out, but custodial detention of the present petitioners in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners viz.,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Bablu Dhara and 2. Rama Dhara shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and

2 conditions as he deems fit and proper and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner no.1 shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and thereafter on all subsequent dates fixed by the Investigating Officer, if required for the sake of investigation, till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional court.

The petitioner no.2 shall make herself available as and when called for by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 2565 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead