Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2603/2026 of TUHINSUVRA CHAKRABORTY @ TUHINSUBHRA CHAKRABORTY AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 11 September 2026
11.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 2603 of 2026 Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of
M/L 161
11.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 2603 of 2026
Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty & Ors.
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Khatra Police Station Case No.
of
dated
14.06.2026
under
Sections
126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/308(7)/109/324(4)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 341/342/323/325/389/307/427/34
of the IPC, 1860 read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.
And
In the matter of : 1. Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @
Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty
2. Tuhin Tushar Mandi
3. Jyotsna Mandi
……Petitioners.
Mr. Debasish Roy
Mr. Avik Ghatak
Mr. Akash Ghosh
…for the Petitioners
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee
Mr. Snehasis Banerjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated in connection with the instant case pursuant to change of administration.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. I have taken into account the nature of the accusations and is of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioners namely
1. Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty
2. Tuhin Tushar Mandi
3. Jyotsna Mandi are unwarranted.
4. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely,
1. Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty
2. Tuhin Tushar Mandi
3. Jyotsna Mandi be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. As the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 shall make themselves available before the Investigating Officer within a period of ten days from the date of the order and shall subsequently follow the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. So far as the petitioner no. 3 is concerned she would make herself available as and when required by the Investigating Officer.
6. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2603 of 2026 is allowed.
7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)