Calcutta High Court
CPAN/988/2026 of SWAPAN KUMAR DUTTA Vs DIPANKAR MANDAL AND ANR on 11 September 2026
Ct. No.10 AGM IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA (Special Civil Jurisdiction) APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 988 of 2026 in W.P.A. No. 4320 of 2026 Swapan Kumar Dutta Versus Dipankar Mandal & Anr. Mr. N. I. Khan. Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee. Mr. Dilip Kumar Mandal. … for the petitioner. Mr. Samrat
11.09.2026
Sl. No.11
Ct. No.10
AGM
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
(Special Civil Jurisdiction)
APPELLATE SIDE
CPAN 988 of 2026
in
W.P.A. No. 4320 of 2026
Swapan Kumar Dutta
Versus
Dipankar Mandal & Anr.
Mr. N. I. Khan.
Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee.
Mr. Dilip Kumar Mandal.
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Samrat Mukherjee, A.G.P.
Ms. Sabita Roy.
Mr. Bhagbat Chaudhuri.
… for the alleged contemnors.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Pursuant to the order dated 21.08.2026, the alleged contemnor no. 2 has filed an affidavit of compliance. A copy of the same be taken on record. From the said compliance as mentioned in paragraph 7 & 8, thereof, it appears that the order dated 9.4.2026 has already been complied with. The relevant paragraph are reproduced below: “7. Accordingly, the Regional Transport Authority, Kolkata has decided to reject the proposal for formulation of the new Auto-Rickshaw route from Ramkrishna Mahashmashan Ghat to Dum Dum Station via Ratanbabu Ghat Road, Gopal Chatterjee Road and Gobinda Mondal Lane.
8. It is, however, recorded that the aforesaid decision shall be without prejudice to the power and jurisdiction of the competent authority to consider
2 any fresh proposal or any subsequent modification of the proposed alignment, if made in accordance with law and supported by appropriate traffic, road-2idth and feasibility assessments, subject to compliance with the applicable provisions of the West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 and the directions of the Hon’ble Court.”
2. Let the Affidavit-of-compliance filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4/alleged contemnor today be kept with the records.
3. In view of the aforesaid compliance, this court is of the opinion that no further proceeding in the contempt application is required.
4. Contempt application stands disposed of.
5. The Contempt Rule if any stands discharged.
6. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.
(Smita Das De, J.)