Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2608/2026 of NASIR SK @ NAZIR SEKH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 11 September 2026
11.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 2608 of 2026 Nasir Sk @ Nazir Sekh Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
M/L 163
11.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 2608 of 2026
Nasir Sk @ Nazir Sekh
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1686 of 2025 dated 27.12.2025 under Sections 179/180/111(3)/111(4)/61(2) of the BNS, 2023
And
In the matter of : Nasir Sk @ Nazir Sekh
……Petitioner.
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Mr. Avik Ghosh
Ms. Ankusha Ghosh
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Satadru Lahiri
Ms. Pramita Banerjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted with another criminal case although he has been previously acquitted of the charges in similar type of offences.
2. Learned Advocate for the State has produced a report reflecting regarding the antecedents and the fact that he has been acquitted of the charges. So far as the present case is concerned State emphasizes on the Call Data Records.
3. I have taken into account the documents which is reflecting from the Case Diary. The principal accused with whom communication was allegedly made by the petitioner was arrested on December, 2025 and the communication of the CDR is dated in the early months of 2025.
4. Having regard to the same I am of the opinion that petitioners custodial detention may not be warranted in connection with the instant case. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.
5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Nasir Sk @ Nazir Sekh be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. As charge-sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks.
7. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2608 of 2026 is allowed.
8. Memo of evidence and report submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)